New wolf council holds first meeting, former large-carnivore specialist shakes things up.
The new Wolf Management Advisory Council (WMAC) met for the first time Wednesday to determine agenda format, logistics and public comment guidelines for the council moving forward.
In January, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), through the Department of the Interior, delisted the gray wolf from the Endangered Species Act. Shortly thereafter, several lawsuits from animal rights activists were filed in federal courts, and Wisconsin held an immediate hunt.
The WMAC is complying with the Open Meetings Act (OMA), which provides for public discourse, transparency and recourse for operating outside of OMA parameters.
MUCC Executive Director Amy Trotter was one of five representatives from stakeholder groups to be selected for the council. She was appointed as a member representing an organization that promotes conservation. The others include Mike Thorman (Michigan Hunting Dog Federation) representing hunting organizations, Beatrice Friedlander (Attorneys for Animals) representing an animal advocacy organization, Dick Pershinske (Upper Peninsula resident) representing agricultural interests and Miles Falck (Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission) representing tribal government.
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Director Daniel Eichinger started the meeting talking about the council’s roles and responsibilities, the current state of delisting and litigation, his take on its durability and Attorney General Dana Nessel’s recent legal brief submitted to a California federal court opposing the delisting.
“The attorney general’s office writ large has responsibility for serving as counsel for the State of Michigan. The AG’s office represents the DNR in legal matters,” Eichinger said. “That role and responsibility is distinct and different from the actions of the AG as an elected official. The AG’s position is not reflective or derivative of and was not by request of the department.”
The WMAC passed a motion to meet monthly through 2021, alternating locations between the northern Lower Peninsula and Upper Peninsula.
Council members also voted to have the ability to request certain presentations from practitioners and experts at future meetings. It was requested that progress updates on the revisions to the Wolf Management Plan be provided at the monthly meetings.
For votes taken by the WMAC, a simple majority vote constitutes approval on a motion. Ties will result in a failed motion. Of the six individuals on the council, each member has the ability to exercise their vote or abstain from voting.
This format is a departure from previous wolf-related stakeholder processes that strove for consensus-only recommendations and thus were not always as bold as they could have been.
“Using a simple-majority format allows council members to firmly and openly state their position and not have to concede to something they merely can live with,” Trotter said.
The WMAC voted that the minority votes of a given motion will have their dissenting opinion preserved via written comments. The majority vote will be documented as the council’s recommendation. Trotter suggested that unanimous recommendations are highlighted in reports.
“While this first meeting was boring to listen to and sometimes confusing for the public, the development of rules of engagement and processes for the newly-appointed council are critical to how it functions going forward,” Trotter said.
A member of the public asked that the WMAC not become a “self-licking ice cream cone.”
“We are not here for ourselves or to rubber-stamp proposals,” Trotter said. “I plan to roll up my sleeves and try to create real and durable changes in Michigan’s wolf management.”
Public comment shakeup
The draft public appearance guidelines were accepted by council members.
Public comments can be made in person or via email by emailing DNR employee Victoria Lischalk, executive assistant to the Wolf Management Advisory Council, at email@example.com.
In total, Wednesday’s meeting garnered about 300 public comments. About 40 of those were in person. The overwhelming majority of in-person comments were from Yoopers in favor of state management of wolves.
Kevin Swanson, former DNR large-carnivore specialist, addressed the WMAC for about 10 minutes on behalf of himself and three others in the audience. Swanson noted his tenure with the department before unveiling potentially damaging information about past wolf survey data.
Swanson, an Ishpeming native, spent about four years as the carnivore specialist. His public testimony detailed the process of internal “auditors” re-counting wolf pack numbers, which he said “is a good thing.” He equated it to a system of checks and balances.
Then things got messy.
Swanson referenced the Strawberry Lake Wolf Pack, which had historically had two wolves in it. He said he “confirmed more than two wolves in that pack in 2016. From recollection, I think the number was four, but I didn’t save the datasheets I should have.”
“A few months later, as I sat in my office, I found out that Brian Roell, who was my auditor, had adjusted my number downward again without the courtesy of telling me he had done it,” Swanson said. “When I found this out, I immediately confronted him as he passed by my office. He then told me to blank off and then walked back to his office.”
After some time had passed, Roell returned to Swanson’s office, apologized and said he would move the pack number back to what Swanson had stated, according to Swanson.
Roell, a DNR wildlife biologist based in Marquette, was the person responsible for compiling and reporting wolf counts at the time — he was the interdepartmental auditor for Swanson’s counts.
“There’s a bigger problem here,” Swanson said. “I stood up and looked at Brian directly and said that I demanded to see all the datasheets for all UP staff. I did this because if he had changed my numbers, the large-carnivore specialist with the State of Michigan, who else is he doing this to? I had been told this had happened to other staff.”
Swanson took the issue to Lansing but did not receive support from supervisors. This ultimately led to him leaving the DNR, he said.
On a Facebook post Thursday morning, Roell said, “… I am not going to take the low road he chose to take and run him down, but I can tell you that the survey has always been done with the utmost scientific rigor so that the minimum population estimate could be defended in the court of law and standup without question from the multiple FOIA request the data has received over the years.”
According to DNR staff present at the meeting, the number of wolves Swanson is referring to as “undercounted” is likely negligible in the grand scheme of the minimum population count, and the total number would still fall within the study’s 95 percent confidence interval.
Trotter, with MUCC, requested that the scientific methodology used to determine minimum wolf population counts be presented at a future meeting. She has also asked that the process for auditing the methodology and data be made available.
Are there questions you would like answered at upcoming WMAC meetings? If so, please email MUCC Policy Coordinator Ian FitzGerald at firstname.lastname@example.org or Public Information Officer Nick Green at email@example.com.
Article from MLive by: By Emily Bingham | firstname.lastname@example.org
MLive file photo (Nic Antaya | MLive.com)
LANSING, MICH. — Michigan is seeing its biggest spike in new hunters in at least two decades.
Hunting license sales for first-time hunters have surged 95% since March, echoing a national trend that’s led more people to pursue outdoor recreation as a safe, socially distant option for activity during the pandemic.
“We have seen a record increase in license sales that we haven’t seen in 20 years,” Shannon Lott, deputy director of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, said in a release. “This is definitely the year that everyone wants to get outside.”
The DNR reports that 440,780 people purchased a hunting license through Oct. 12. More than 64,000 of those buyers were first-time hunters — 31,000 more new hunters than at the same point last year. Women and youth hunters are among the demographic groups propelling that increase. People ages 10-16 drove a 144% increase in license sales across all hunting species, while the number of female hunters has risen nearly 25%.
Michiganders also bought 9% more fishing licenses this year, with the total number of new anglers rising 42%, said Dustin Isenhoff, DNR marketing specialist.
These numbers are a sharp contrast to a downward trend in hunting license sales both in state and nationwide over the past several decades, as baby-boomers are spending less time hunting, and younger generations opt not to pursue the sport.
But this year, all types of outdoor recreation got a boost. Parks and trails across the state have been reporting record visitor numbers, as camping, hiking, bird-watching and kayaking joined hunting and fishing on the list of activities enjoying a sudden surge in popularity.
The DNR and sporting groups are thrilled by Michigan’s new interest in hunting and fishing and are considering ways to encourage participation in the years to come, Isenhoff said.
In Michigan, hunting license sales generate about $61 million annually for wildlife and natural resources conservation projects, with an additional $32 million coming from a federal levy on hunting and fishing equipment sales, according to the Michigan Wildlife Council.
To read the entire article – CLICK HERE
The SCI board of directors meeting was held on May 9-11 in Washington, DC. The Flint chapter was represented by President Dennis Peters, Vice President George Peterman, SCI President Elect, Scott (and Angela) Chapman, and Regional Representative Neal (and Debbie) Porter.
Day 1 was Lobby Day.
Day 2 was committee meeting day with all of the SCI sub committees holding meetings and work sessions. The Audit Committee (Louis Cole, Chairman) gave several presentations throughout the day. The committee is now monitoring and analyzing chapters’ 30% contributions from fundraisers. Recommendations are being made to chapters, regional representatives and the Chapter Service Specialists to increase fundraisers’ net income and insure proper compliance with SCI and the IRS. The Finance Committee (Neal Porter is a member) had a portfolio review with manager, BNY, and has RFP’s out as they monitor investments. The Finance Committee also made a recommendation to the board to purchase the SCI intellectual property from SCIF for $731,000. The Communications Committee is reviewing RFP’s for a new communications plan.
The SCIPAC Dinner on Friday night featured the Alaskan legend, Congressman Don Young as guest speaker and honored Michigan Representative, Triston Cole as the state legislator of the year. Triston was introduced by Scott Chapman, who recalled a memorable winter camping trip in the Jordan River Valley Triston Cole’s district) during his college days. Mr. Cole was also the SCI Flint legislator of the year!
Day 3 was the official board meeting and the annual elections were held during the meeting. Paul Babaz passed the President’s Pin on to Steve Skold. Scott Chapman moved up from Deputy President Elect to President Elect. He will be the first president of SCI from the Flint Chapter. Another Flint (and Lansing) member, Mike Leonard was elected to SCI VP, along with Sven Lindquist, Jeff Kimble, Lew Webb, and Mike Crawford. John McClaurin was elected to the position of Corporate Secretary and Mid-Michigan Chapter past president Don Harter was elected to Treasurer. The SCI BOD committed to purchase the Intellectual property from SCIF.
Laird Hamberlin was introduced as the new CEO of Safari Club International. Laird is a former VP of SCI and has an outstanding resume of business accomplishments. He also hunts as often as time and family commitments permit. Laird spoke about the three pillars of SCI- membership, convention, and advocacy. We need each one to support our mission and we must focus on each one. Laird also discussed our communications and media presence or lack thereof- it will be a major point of emphasis moving forward.
Gun control is one of the most hotly debated topics in politics right now, both at the state and national levels. Because it concerns the tools that many of us use in our sport it is something that interests and can affect us as hunters . The US House of Representatives recently passed H.R. 8, a bill that would expand the requirement of a criminal background check to all firearm purchases. Currently background checks are only required on guns sold by licensed federal firearm dealers and private individuals do not need to do a National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) on the purchaser to legally sell a gun. The intent of H.R. 8 is to prevent dangerous individuals from having access to firearms. To determine how effective H.R. 8 might be one needs to understand the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Established in 1998 and administered by the FBI, NICS requires a person to answer a series of questions about felony convictions, drug use, mental illness and several other qualifiers prior to being allowed to purchase a gun. Their information is cross checked against the national database and if the applicant has no history in the database the transaction can proceed.
The current system has been plagued with numerous problems which allow people that shouldn’t pass NICS to still buy a gun. The primary reason for this is that agencies fail to provide NCIS with necessary records or what is provided is incorrect. The Justice Department claims that millions of records have not been submitted by the states to the FBI. This has allowed several of the recent mass murders (Sutherland Springs, Texas and Charleston, South Carolina) to buy their murder weapons even though they underwent a NICS . There are other problems as well. People will lie when filling out the form (a 10 year felony) and in 2017 this was done by 112,000 people. Only 12 of these cases were ever prosecuted. The licensed Federal Firearms Dealers, who by law must do a NICS before they can make a sale, often don’t obey the rules either. Enforcement of the rules is sporadic and it is rare for a dealer to lose their license because of bad or nonexistent records. Finally, H.R. 8 allows for a number of exceptions where a NICS is not required by law. These include sales between close relatives, from police or active military personnel and loans for hunting, target shooting or in cases where a gun is necessary to prevent death or bodily harm.
The concept of requiring a NICS for almost everyone to buy a gun has been tried at the state level in several places. One study showed however that after California enacted this type of law that there was no change in firearm related homicides or suicides. When Indiana and Tennessee repealed their expanded background check laws there was no change in these rates there either. A Johns Hopkins researcher found that comprehensive background checks in urban counties were actually associated with an increase in firearm homicides though the author cautioned that the new law was probably not the cause because the homicide rates were already rising at that time.
Given that the current background check system has so many flaws it is not surprising that this new bill has little chance of ever making it through the Senate or being signed into law by the President. The members of Congress who voted for H.R. 8 probably knew this so it’s reasonable to assume that their intent was not to create legislation that would improve public safety as they claim.
If keeping guns out of the hands of people that should not have them was their goal they could have passed legislation that forced agencies to keep the NICS database accurate and up to date. Enforcement of our current laws would have stopped individuals from falsifying documents to pass a NICS. Congress could also have added language to H.R. 8 that requires the FBI to notify local law enforcement if a convicted felon fails a NICS in their area. That might have actually done something to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous individuals. By not taking a few simple steps our current Congress showed that improving public safety was not their goal. Bowing to public pressure and the media may be a good move politically but it doesn’t solve problems.
The current motivation for more and stricter gun control laws stem from several recent mass shootings. The tragedy that left 26 dead at the Sutherland Springs Church in Texas is a perfect example of the broken NICS system. The shooter, Devin Patrick Kelly, was convicted of domestic assault in a military court in 2012 but the Air Force never sent the information that would have prevented him from passing a NICS to the FBI. Kelly also lied on the NICS form about his prior conviction and made multiple credible threats both verbally and on social media that should have made the authorities aware of his intent.
As hunters and responsible gun owners we can agree that the members of Congress who voted for passage of H.R. 8 need to be watched very closely. We need to make our voices heard and the message should be that we don’t want our Second Amendment Rights tampered with so that lawmakers can appease a segment of the public . It’s a never ending battle so please support the NRA, SCI and like minded organizations.
By Carl Griffin